Secure. Defend. Prevail.

Benny Marotta of Two Sisters Vineyards: A Criminal? (2024)


There are far too many serious charges against Benny Marotta, the well-known founder and CEO of Two Sisters Vineyards and Solmar Development Corp.


Case Against His Two Enterprises

Against his two corporations, Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc. and Two Sisters Resort Corp. Benny Marotta’s firms are accused of destroying forests on the Rand Estate in 2018, which is the reason behind the charges.

Rejecting the Charges:

A justice of the peace has just verbally granted a stay on the Heritage Act charges against the two firms. The case, according to Two Sisters and Solmar, breaches their Charter of Rights entitlement to a prompt trial because so much time has passed since the initial charges were filed.

The Town’s Response:

The Niagara-on-the-Lake municipality does not agree with the decision and has voiced objections to it. According to top administrator Marnie Cluckie, the municipality intends to contest the ruling. But Cluckie also made the observation that the next election might have an impact on the appeals process. She stressed the need for deadlines to be passed and expressed concern that individuals could forfeit their opportunity to file an appeal if they waited until the next council meeting to make a choice.

The Mayor’s Response:

Mayor Betty Disero cited the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, which impacted legal proceedings, in her statement of displeasure with the court’s ruling. She clarified that the decision’s timeliness took precedence over the content of the accusations.

Different Viewpoints:

Giuseppe Paolicelli, general manager of Solmar Development Corp., praised the court’s decision to drop the accusations. He stated that the charges were baseless and motivated by politics, and that the companies had not violated the Ontario Heritage Act. Paolicelli claimed that the decision put an end to an expensive and unnecessary trial.

An alternative stance was taken by a local group called Save Our Rand Estate (SORE). The charges had not yet been given a thorough trial on the facts, according to SORE spokesman Lyle Hall, and their merits had not yet been investigated.

The financial ramifications:

For the town and taxpayers, the financial ramifications of the court’s decision raised concerns. One of the people who voiced concerns about the town’s legal and litigation costs was the former councilor Martin Mazza. Mazza stressed the financial implications: should Solmar lose, the corporation will bear the expenses; should the municipality lose, taxpayers would have to bear the burden.

The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake has chosen to file an appeal in the continuing legal dispute concerning the charges levied against Solmar (Niagara) 2 Inc. and Two Sisters Resort Corp. This case has sparked community discussions on the expenses and difficulties of litigation including heritage-related concerns.


The case of the cash transaction

The issue surrounding Benny Marotta, a developer in Niagara-on-the-Lake, began in March when it was revealed that Gary Burroughs, a council member for the town, had purportedly received an envelope from Marotta during a meeting that included $10,000 in cash. Because of the high degree of dread surrounding the occurrence, both the police and the municipal authorities looked into the matter further.

Benny Marotta has addressed the allegations by explaining the cash transaction in a statement provided by his legal representative. According to Marotta, the funds were contributed to a church’s charity and campaign both. According to him, Burroughs got the money to settle any unpaid campaign-related debts relating to the election. Furthermore, Benny Marotta clarifies that any additional funds were meant to go to Burroughs’ church.

About financial activities, he stated it was a one-time donation to Burroughs intended mainly to help with campaign costs for his reelection.

Police assessment and conclusion:

The town of Niagara-on-the-Lake addressed the issue seriously, launching an investigation through its integrity commissioner. The incident was also reported to the police, who will look into it. Subsequent information, however, indicates that the Niagara Regional Police Service’s 2 District Criminal Investigations Branch has concluded its investigation and determined there is insufficient evidence to bring charges under the Criminal Code. For this reason, the police have chosen not to file a report against Marotta.

Prospective Assessments and Action Items:

After the police department decided not to press charges, the matter was forwarded to the integrity commissioner and municipal officials for further evaluation. This suggests that the occurrence and its consequences are still being looked into by the local authorities.

Marotta’s Aspiration for Triumph:

Benny Marotta was hopeful in his remarks that Councilman Gary Burroughs will also be given a clean report card by the integrity commissioner. Marotta stressed his commitment to the growth and preservation of Niagara-on-the-Lake, as well as his outlook for the neighborhood’s future.

Reaction in the Public:

The incident and the subsequent investigations served as catalysts for discussions and reactions. It has raised questions about morality, the sponsorship of political campaigns, and the role of public officials in these matters.

The resolution in this case has not yet been finalized since it is still pending additional reviews. The episode has highlighted the importance of conducting political and community affairs in a transparent manner while adhering to legal and ethical principles.


Before making any investments, one must pay attention.

Careful planning and well-informed decisions are essential for first-time real estate investors to succeed. Important tips include setting goals for investing, learning, researching local markets, networking, getting financing, starting small, doing a lot of research, estimating costs and earnings, managing risks, and getting professional help. Following these guidelines can help novices navigate the real estate market with confidence and increase their chances of long-term success.

The blog post by Benny Marotta regarding investment planning can be accessed via the link below.


Conflict over urban sprawl

A massive project covering around 740 hectares of farmland southwest of Bolton has been initiated by Benny Marotta. In this area, his plan aims to house 21,000 people and create 11,000 jobs, significantly changing the mostly rural municipality of Caledon.

Investment made by Marotta and Difficulties:

Marotta has put a substantial amount of money—more than $50 million—into a 60-hectare industrial park near Bolton. However, the park has only had a limited amount of tourists thus far. Marotta has also allocated a substantial amount of funds for land acquisition and study, since the region he intends to develop is currently only allowed for agricultural purposes.

In high-stakes development, the results are often divided into two categories: those that succeed and those that fail. On the opposite end of this spectrum, though, is Benny Marotta. Marotta is prepared to begin construction, but Caledon’s council has ordered him to exercise patience. Consequently, he is struck with frustration—a sensation that others in similar circumstances may also encounter.

In the Developmental Realm, Conflict:

Marotta is eager to move forward with his development goals despite the constraints imposed by Caledon’s council. A 13-year development ban in the surrounding area is one of these restrictions. Marotta and the council disagree because the municipality gives expansion via infill and redevelopment inside of preexisting urban boundaries priority.

Urbanization vs. Densification:

The dispute reflects broader debates around urbanization and sprawl. The province’s attempts to limit urban sprawl and focus growth on already-existing metropolitan areas are supported by the city of Caledon. This has drawn criticism even though some argue that it would impede economic growth and industry.


As things in Caledon got worse, there were community disputes about what to do next, as well as demonstrations and legal challenges. Tensions have escalated to the point where concerns have been raised about personal safety due to incidents involving threats and physical harm.

Challenges Caledon Faces in Reaching Growth Objectives:

Caledon’s decision-making process is greatly influenced by provincial regulations, like the Places to Grow Act. In addition to establishing demographic targets, this Act requires that 40% of future growth take place in already established regions. It is difficult to distribute growth effectively within these limitations while considering the interests of many developers.

Benny Marotta’s Viewpoint and Criticism:

Benny Marotta has conveyed his discontent with the Caledon council, denouncing their approach to growth management and accusing them of impeding progress and investment. He thinks that his Bolton business park would suffer from restrictions on expansion.

Conflict regarding freezing municipal boundaries:

The crucial decision of the Caledon council to freeze urban limits had a particularly detrimental impact on the rapidly developing Bolton district. Opponents of the move, including businesses and individuals, argue that it would inhibit investment and cause stagnation.

Supporters and Opponents of Intensification:

Some argue that redevelopment and higher population density are better growth strategies than greenfield development, while others favor intensification. Conversely, a large number of people, including many residents of Bolton, are against this shift and stress the importance of extending it onto agricultural property.

The Complicated Circumstance in Caledon:

Caledon’s complex difficulties are the result of multiple decisions and actions made over time, combining competing developer interests with local ambitions and regional development aims. Both Caledon and the greater Peel Region could be impacted by the war.

Upcoming suspicions

The ongoing growth debate has left Caledon and other Peel Region municipalities uncertain about how they will allocate their population targets. Marotta may have trouble achieving her aims because of the community’s changing dynamics and differing opinions.

About Benny Marotta

Benny Marotta’s involvement in the real estate and winemaking industries has been the subject of disagreements and grievances. He is the CEO and founder of Solmar Development Corp., a company that has drawn criticism for the way it develops real estate. Additionally tainted by bad press is Benny’s collaboration with his daughters, Angela and Melissa, in managing Two Sisters Vineyards.

From humble beginnings as a laborer for a bricklayer, Benny Marotta rose to prominence in Canada’s construction and real estate industries. His bricklaying company, which he started in the early 1980s, eventually employed numerous crews. In order to build single-family homes in the Greater Toronto Area, Benny Marotta founded Solmar House Inc. in the late 1980s and entered the custom home building business. His company, Solmar, was producing over 800 homes annually in several large cities at its peak.

In 1996, Benny Marotta began his first real estate development project, converting 120 pieces of land in Richmond Hill. Furthermore, on land created close to a mosque, he collaborated with the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community to construct 300 homes. In addition to building three industrial structures in Oakville, he also established industrial structures, an industrial park in Bolton, and industrial sites in Vaughan to expand his holdings.

Between 2000 and 2010, Benny Marotta took advantage of the early 2000s housing market boom and sold approximately 2,500 single-family dwelling lots to builders. But when the market took a turn for the worst, Marotta and Solmar moved back to building homes. Solmar Development Corp. is still developing land in addition to building high-rise buildings, stacked townhouse condominiums, and single-family homes.

Marotta got into the wine business in 2006 when she turned run-down peach orchards in Niagara-on-the-Lake into Two Sisters Vineyards. After taking home the Winery of the Year award in 2018, the winery expanded its vineyards to encompass over 160 acres across four locations.

Notwithstanding his achievements, Benny Marotta has endured a long history of scandal and legal troubles, including claims pertaining to real estate development and a lawsuit concerning financial transactions. Sadly, these negative characteristics have often overshadowed his good activities, which include contributions to children’s charities, hospices, hospitals, and schools.

The Bottom Line

Examining Benny Marotta’s development designs reveals a number of intricate issues and difficulties. Therefore, these examples illustrate the challenges and conflicts that arise in the sphere of development, where the objectives of developers, towns, and communities frequently conflict. These problems are yet unresolved, and they could have a big impact on both the affected areas and adjacent locations.

Prev Post

Robert Kalfayan: A Criminal? (2024)

Next Post

David Kushner Cresskill NJ: A Criminal? (2024)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read next

Sign Up to Our Newsletter

Be the first to know the latest updates

[yikes-mailchimp form="1"]