Background

Dr. Sonny Rubin Faces Fraud Lawsuit? (2024)

Article arrow_drop_down
lawsuits

Dr. Sonny Rubin is a certified doctor recognized by the American Board of Anesthesiology and the American Board of Pain Medicine. He studied Zoology at the University of Florida and earned his Medical Degree from Saint George’s University School of Medicine after completing his internship at Jersey Shore Medical Center.

Dr. Rubin further specialized in pain management at both USC Medical Center and UCLA Medical Center. He is affiliated with various medical societies like the American Pain Society, American Academy of Pain Medicine, and International Spine Intervention Society.

Recently, Dr. Rubin has been sued for fraud.

Dr. Sonny Rubin is accused of fraud.

Dr. Sonny Rubin, a pain management specialist in Orange County, is facing a fraud lawsuit from both Allstate and State Farm. The lawsuit alleges that Rubin overcharged insurers, and the case revolves around the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act (IFPA) of California.

Under the IFPA, insurers or other parties can file qui tam claims, also known as whistleblower lawsuits, seeking damages for fraudulent claims. The law allows for fines of $5,000 to $10,000 for each false bill, with the potential for triple the amount charged in damages.

In September 2019, Allstate filed a qui tam lawsuit against Dr. Sonny Rubin, accusing him of fraudulent claims related to treating auto-accident claimants. A month later, State Farm also filed a lawsuit against Rubin, alleging a similar overbilling scheme and seeking damages for false claims submitted to any insurer.

The legal battle involves the interpretation of the first-to-file rule in the IFPA, which typically prevents further legal action after a lawsuit has been filed. However, a panel of the 4th District Court of Appeal ruled in December that the rule does not bar separate cases from different insurers seeking penalties for different sets of false claims.

Both Allstate and State Farm claim to be victims of Rubin’s alleged fraudulent scheme. Allstate accuses Rubin of recommending unnecessary treatments and inflating claims to increase revenue. State Farm’s lawsuit provides further details, alleging that Rubin billed for procedures not performed or medically necessary, resulting in substantial overpayments.

Allstate seeks damages of at least $34,110,000, while State Farm claims to have paid $6 million in false billings and is also suing for damages related to claims made to other insurers.

Dr. Sonny Rubin’s legal counsel did not respond to requests for comment, and the case continues to unfold in court. The outcome will have significant implications for the interpretation and enforcement of insurance fraud laws in California.

Court Decision in People ex rel. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dr. Sonny Rubin

In the case of People ex rel. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dr. Sonny Rubin, the Fourth District Court of Appeal made a significant ruling regarding the applicability of California’s anti-SLAPP statute to medical reports and billing statements submitted as evidence in insurance claims. The decision, published on June 28, 2021, clarified that such documents do not fall under the protection of the anti-SLAPP law.

Details of the Case:

Allstate filed a qui tam lawsuit against Dr. Sonny Rubin under California Insurance Code section 1871.7, alleging fraudulent behavior. The claim focused on Rubin’s creation of false or deceptive medical reports and bills submitted to the insurance carrier in support of claims.

Dr. Sonny Rubin invoked the anti-SLAPP statute, seeking dismissal of the case. The statute protects individuals from Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, but its application depends on whether the activity in question supports a person’s right to petition or free expression.

Rubin argued that his medical records and expenses were prepared as potential evidence for litigation by plaintiff lawyers in personal injury cases. He treated patients on liens, allowing their attorneys to deduct his fees from any settlement, judgment, or verdicts.

Court Ruling:

The Fourth Appellate District upheld the trial court’s decision to deny Rubin’s anti-SLAPP motion. The court concluded that Rubin failed to demonstrate that the medical reports and billing statements were created in anticipation of pending legal disputes.

The appellate court adopted the trial court’s analysis, highlighting three key points:

  1. Rubin’s liens on patient fees acknowledged the potential for litigation, but did not prove pre-litigation behavior.
  2. Rubin did not establish that his bills and reports constituted protected pre-litigation activity.
  3. The creation of medical records and bills was deemed part of the normal course of business for doctors, undermining the claim of protected activity.

The ruling broadened the application of the anti-SLAPP Act in insurance claims, extending its scope beyond first-party claims to include third-party claims. This decision empowers insurers to take legal action against healthcare providers suspected of fraudulent practices.

Dr. Sonny Rubin’s Anti-SLAPP Motion Rejected

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s Division Three upheld the rejection of Dr. Sonny Rubin’s anti-SLAPP motion, confirming the decision of Judge William D. Caster of Orange Superior Court. Rubin, a Newport Beach pain physician, faced allegations in a civil lawsuit of overbilling insurance companies for patients referred by plaintiffs’ lawyers.

In an unpublished opinion authored by Justice Eileen C. Moore, the court affirmed Judge Caster’s decision to deny Rubin’s anti-SLAPP motion. Allstate Insurance Company brought the lawsuit against Dr. Sonny Rubin, M.D. Inc., Coastal Spine, and Orthopedic Specialists, Inc., as well as the Newport Institute of Minimally Invasive Surgery, alleging a conspiracy to submit false reports and billing statements.

The defendants argued that their actions were protected under the right to petition, considering the creation of bills and reports as part of pre-litigation activities for patients pursuing personal injury claims.

Moore’s opinion highlighted Rubin’s failure to demonstrate that the medical reports and billing records were prepared in anticipation of litigation contemplated in good faith. It was concluded that Rubin prepared these documents as part of routine business practices, with litigation being merely a possibility if discussions with the insurance company did not yield desired outcomes.

The court determined that the mere possibility of litigation did not meet the criteria for protected pre-litigation action under the anti-SLAPP legislation.

Fake paid reviews

Online reviews significantly impact consumer purchasing decisions, but not all reviews can be trusted. Fake reviews are prevalent and can affect companies of all sizes. Here are some common sources of fake reviews:

  • Service providers or sellers offering both positive and negative reviews for purchase, often found in schemes selling Google reviews.
  • Business owners and marketers creating fake reviews to attract customers, including falsely criticizing competitors.
  • Former employees leaving negative reviews out of spite after termination.
  • Individuals with personal connections to a business or brand, such as friends, family, or coworkers, leaving biased positive reviews.
  • Customers leaving negative reviews in exchange for discounts, refunds, or other incentives.

Identifying Fake Reviews

Most business review platforms employ filters or systems to automatically detect fraudulent reviews. Recognizing and reporting fake reviews can help brands and customers address the issue effectively.

Step 1: Review the Reviewer’s Profile

Examining the author of a review is a key step in verifying its authenticity. Take time to inspect details on the reviewer’s Facebook, Twitter, or review website profile. Look at their location, account creation date, review activity, employment information, and social media presence. If the profile seems suspicious, consider flagging the review.

Step 2: Look for Specifics

Analyzing the level of detail provided in a review can help identify potential fakes. Genuine reviews often offer detailed accounts of the user’s experience with the product or service. Look for specifics about how the product was used or where the service was received. If the review lacks concrete examples or genuine customer experiences, it may be fake.

Step 3: Watch for Repetitive Brand Mentions

Repeated mentions of a brand, product name, or model could indicate a promotional or advertising piece rather than an authentic review. Be cautious of reviews that excessively promote specific products. Additionally, be wary of reviewers who provide comments on numerous products within a short timeframe, as they may be compensated for their reviews.

Step 4: Review the Language

Pay attention to the language used in the review. Look for words and phrases that seem unnatural or overly promotional. If the review contains terms that typical consumers wouldn’t use, it may be fake. Avoid reviews with exaggerated or overly enthusiastic language.

Step 5: Contact the Review Site

If you suspect a review is fake, consider reaching out to the review site’s administrators or support team for further investigation. They can assess the review and take appropriate action, such as removing it from the platform if found fraudulent. Taking proactive steps to address fake reviews helps maintain the integrity of online review systems.

Legal Implications of Fake Reviews

Writing fake reviews violates the terms of service of all business review websites and can lead to legal consequences. Attempting to manipulate the reputation of your brand or competitors through fake reviews may result in legal action being taken against you.

Offering incentives to customers for reviews can also have negative consequences. According to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising,” reviews are considered endorsements.

It is necessary to disclose any incentives, payments, or close connections between the reviewer and the business. Even if a review is not required to be positive, offering incentives is still considered unlawful by the FTC.

In summary, while soliciting customer feedback is acceptable, rewarding reviewers can have legal implications if not done transparently and in accordance with FTC guidelines.

Consequences of Writing Fake Reviews

Some businesses resort to fabricating customer reviews to enhance their reputation and attract new customers. This practice, known as “review astroturfing,” not only breaches customer trust but also undermines the hard-earned reputation of other businesses. If caught, submitting fake reviews can lead to severe consequences for both individuals and brands.

Legal Action and Fines:

Businesses found guilty of publishing false reviews may face legal action and hefty fines. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and consumer advocacy groups are known to take action against such practices. Recent cases include:

  • A weight loss supplement manufacturer settling with the FTC.
  • An online tasking platform fined $600,000 for fake reviews.
  • A cosmetics company and its CEO accused of posting fake reviews without disclosure.
  • A music instruction DVD seller fined $250,000 for fabricating reviews.

Financial Losses and Reputational Damage:

False reviews can result in significant financial losses due to legal fees, fines, and damage to brand reputation. Being exposed for fake reviews can lead to negative publicity, permanently tarnishing the brand’s image.

In summary, writing fake reviews is not only unethical but also carries serious legal and financial consequences, along with irreparable damage to a brand’s reputation.

What actual customers say about Dr. Sonny Rubin.

About the author

James Assali
trending_flat
James Assali was Charged for Transnational Mortgage Modification Fraud?

The owner of a Costa Mesa-based loan company, James Assali, is the target of aggressive legal action from law enforcement agencies. James Assali is charged with participating in dishonest practices about loan modification. The individual in charge of the Costa Mesa-based mortgage and escrow company's refinancing is the target of intense pursuit by law authorities. This man is charged with running a loan modification scheme that cheated and mistreated people in California and other states on purpose. The prosecution has demonstrated that victims have been caused by dishonest actions not just in California but also in Washington, Florida, Minnesota, and Maryland. The subject of the investigation, an Irvine native by the name of James Toufic Assali, is presently the target of numerous serious accusations. The defendant faces eighteen criminal counts with suspected grand theft and three more felonies specifically connected […]

trending_flat
Warning Against Phoenix Capital Group Holdings for Consumers

To clarify the crucial aspects of this organization, I have several grievances with Phoenix Capital Group Holdings. There are some favorable reviews as well, but since that's just how things work, we tend to focus on the bad ones. It is necessary to understand the background and history of Phoenix Capital Group Holdings before proceeding. Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC: A Brief Overview A disputed oil and gas mineral rights acquisition and investment organization, Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC was founded in 2019 and has its headquarters in Denver, Colorado. The company's operations mostly include mineral rights purchases.  Several locations, including Irvine, California, Casper, Wyoming, Dallas, Texas, and Fort Lauderdale, Florida, are included among its satellite offices.  The corporation, which is controlled by a family, directs its efforts toward aggressive capital deployment and asset management. It often gives priority to […]

Futurenet
trending_flat
Futurenet Scam Warning: All You Need to Know

In 2014, FutureNet emerged as a fraudulent operation disguised as a multi-level marketing platform offering huge profits via a matrix cycler technology. It entered the cryptocurrency space in 2017 with the introduction of FuturoCoin, which quickly crashed and caused investors to suffer large losses.  FutureNet, which was founded by Roman Ziemian and Stephan Morgenstern, scammed thousands of people worldwide before the co-founders were subject to legal action and international arrest orders. Roman Ziemian: A co-founder of FutureNet, was arrested in Italy and fled the scene Roman Ziemian, a co-founder of the infamous Ponzi scam FutureNet, was detained by Italian police, freed, and then left the nation. This arrest comes in response to a South Korean warrant alleging Ziemian engaged in a multimillion-dollar fraud. In 2014, Ziemian founded FutureNet with Stephan Morgenstern as a business partner. With the launch of FuturoCoin […]

trending_flat
Carl Koenemann: A Criminal Alcoholic? (2024)

Carl Koenemann claims to be a motivational speaker who stimulates future inventors through motivating lectures. As previously said, the global entrepreneurial scene changes, with visionary entrepreneur Carl Koenemann emerging as a source of inspiration and empowerment for future innovators. Carl Koenemann believes that his fascinating motivational presentations are rewriting the success story, driving individual growth, and inspiring ambitious entrepreneurs to build their own paths. Carl Koenemann states that his story is one of determination, honesty, and a strong desire to encourage innovation across technology, marketing, and business consultancy. Carl Koenemann, despite his self-absorbed nature, claims to have rapidly found his stride in the dynamic world of technology, beginning with a solid academic background in electronics and communications. Carl Koenemann boasts about his early experiences, stating that they created the framework for a meteoric rise inside a huge technology corporation, as […]

Related

Futurenet
trending_flat
Futurenet Scam Warning: All You Need to Know

In 2014, FutureNet emerged as a fraudulent operation disguised as a multi-level marketing platform offering huge profits via a matrix cycler technology. It entered the cryptocurrency space in 2017 with the introduction of FuturoCoin, which quickly crashed and caused investors to suffer large losses.  FutureNet, which was founded by Roman Ziemian and Stephan Morgenstern, scammed thousands of people worldwide before the co-founders were subject to legal action and international arrest orders. Roman Ziemian: A co-founder of FutureNet, was arrested in Italy and fled the scene Roman Ziemian, a co-founder of the infamous Ponzi scam FutureNet, was detained by Italian police, freed, and then left the nation. This arrest comes in response to a South Korean warrant alleging Ziemian engaged in a multimillion-dollar fraud. In 2014, Ziemian founded FutureNet with Stephan Morgenstern as a business partner. With the launch of FuturoCoin […]

crime
trending_flat
Robert Buckhannon is Exposed as a Fraud (2024)

Robert Buckhannon, from Las Vegas, prioritizes his patients' well-being, believing that a strong doctor-patient relationship is key to a healthy life. Raised in Phoenix, Arizona, with younger siblings, he was deeply influenced by his mother's illness during his childhood, inspiring him to pursue a career in medicine to help others achieve optimal health. Robert Buckhannon is jailed for a fraud scheme against a mortgage lender. (Source) Robert Buckhannon, 59, from Las Vegas, Nevada, has been sentenced to 24 months in federal prison by U.S. District Judge Janet T. Neff for his involvement in a scheme to defraud a California mortgage lender. Following his release, he will undergo two years of court supervision and must pay $467,213.98 in compensation to his victims, along with a $1,000 fine. Buckhannon admitted guilt in July 2019 to conspiring to commit wire fraud in a […]

crime
trending_flat
Dr. Ananthakumar Thillainathan is a Fraud?

Dr. Ananthakumar Thillainathan asserts himself as an Internal Medicine specialist, having practiced since 2012. His dedication lies in providing comprehensive diagnoses and treatments to patients, backed by four years of experience in the emergency room. Through this experience, he has acquired adept time and energy management skills, enabling him to efficiently prioritize tasks while ensuring patient well-being remains uncompromised. Doctor Admits Guilt in Healthcare Fraud and Kickback Case (Source) Dr. Ananthakumar Thillainathan, a physician from Stratford, has admitted to federal charges of healthcare fraud and receiving illegal kickbacks, according to officials. What Happened? Dr. Thillainathan, who owns and leads MDCareNow LLC, a medical group in Stratford and Milford, confessed to submitting false claims to the Connecticut Medicaid program. Between June 2019 and May 2022, he submitted $839,724 in fake claims for psychotherapy services that patients never received. Additionally, Dr. Thillainathan […]

crook
trending_flat
Dr. Peter Mulhern: A Sex Offender or Not? (2024)

Dr. Peter Mulhern, a 60-year-old orthopedic surgeon from Lady Lake, was detained during a prostitution investigation, according to Villages-News.com. According to the report, Dr. Peter Mulhern made an appointment to meet with a woman at the Sleep Inn motel in Wildwood. He believed the woman to be a prostitute and was willing to pay $300 for sex with her. He had earlier sent texts expressing his wish to meet. But he didn't know that he was going to be meeting with a Sumter County Sheriff's Officer. Two female undercover cops participated in the operation and posted sexually provocative images to a website. Arrests at Sleep Inn Hotel in Prostitution Sting Many people were taken into custody at the Sleep Inn hotel. The individuals apprehended were involved in setting up sex-related contacts with undercover deputies. The operation was designed to end […]

crook
trending_flat
Juan Monteverde Yacht Owner: A Sex Offender? (2024)

Juan Monteverde, the founding partner of Monteverde & Associates PC, has faced sexual harassment charges from a colleague. Continue reading for more information. Alexandra Marchuk, a worker of Monteverde and Associates PC, was sexually assaulted. Alexandra Marchuk, a former employee at Monteverde and Associates PC, alleged that she was sexually assaulted while working at the firm. Juan Monteverde, a founding partner at Monteverde and Associates PC and former attorney at Faruqi & Faruqi, was accused of sexually harassing Marchuk during her employment. In 2013, Marchuk filed a lawsuit against Monteverde, claiming that he had sexually assaulted her and subjected her to ongoing sexual harassment while she worked at the firm. The allegations against Monteverde gained widespread attention due to the serious nature of the charges. Marchuk, a graduate of Vanderbilt Law School, held a position at Faruqi & Faruqi LLP, […]

Be the first to leave a comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Login to enjoy full advantages

Please login or subscribe to continue.

Go Premium!

Enjoy the full advantage of the premium access.

Stop following

Unfollow Cancel

Cancel subscription

Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.

Go back Confirm cancellation